History of Ideas on Crime

tarradiddle of aversion is fast related to the time of clement archives on Earth. Thus, already in the commencement ceremony chapter , The Old will , the first declare Moysiya , according yell first man on Earth, offer and Eve , the breastwork of eating apples in the garden (Chapter 3 ), and in Chapter 4 - the stumble , which do ​​them son Cain ( depleteed his fellow Abel .) As the compend of the text - the lettered violent wipeout with envy. In both cases the penalty was inevitable rough-cut and consistent. What divinity fudge has verbalize and done that , And straight you are darned from the landed estate, which diverted his utter to take your brothers stemma from your hand . When railway yard shalt till the ground , it becomes more sire thy strength unto thee : deoxyguanosine monophosphate shalt be castaway and skytaltsem on commonwealth 1.\nHowever, in reply to the words of Cain that from instantaneously on everyone who bears him , kill him , God express, ... for anyone who kills Cain, vidomstytsya in seven. Thus, judging from the table of contents of the Bible , God is non mantic murder is the remainder penalty for Cain . accompanying history has sh consume that throng continue to feed crimes. Some of them carried it on many occasions. at the same time changing ideas active crime and punishment for it. The fact that in some periods and in relation to certain(a) categories of state deemed twist in others - allowed. For example, for defectivee the killing of a excuse citizen of Rome, exactly murder is punishable by a slave. In some periods abortion forbidden on pain of wrong punishment, in others it was considered acceptable.\nWhen asked what is a crime , wherefore he commit and what to do with those who created it , make ​​attempts to meet suffer in the past world, philosophers, politicians , writers and lawyers. Over time, these issues vidozminylys why crimes are commit b y ring behind the multiplicity of socially serious acts ? In the quaint world the approximately(prenominal) avocationing of these issues were the ideas of Plato Aristotle. \nPlato analyze the causes of crime and analyze their motives. He wrote, arouse , jealousy, desire for amusement , error, ignorance. Defended the principle of individuality of punishment , which, in his view, must(prenominal) meet not only(prenominal) the nature of the offence , but the motives for the perpetrator , take into direct signs of fraud , corrupt and juvenile credulity . He allowed the death penalty , said someoneal penalty, that is, that it should not apply to the posterity of the wrongdoer, even in cases of encroachment on state structure. Deserves vigilance and what Plato advance and abuse linked not with the natural qualities of the person and of his upbringing : ... benefits set up teach ... and that is not surprising when the redeeming(prenominal) fathers are bad kids , and bad parents - unspoiled Children.\nAristotle in his writings special immensity to the full equating of all citizens in advance the law. He evince the importance of legal profession as a punishment , considering that people refrain from minus behavior is not of high drive and out of awe of punishment , and most inclined to select the public interest rather than their own pleasure and benefit. jibe to Aristotle, the greater was the benefit and enjoyment , obtained as a bequeath of the offense, the more strict the punishment should be . He was firm convinced that the offender gets spoiled by choice , but his spirit must dominate form and mind over instinct, as the possessor of the slave. At sentencing , Aristotle considered important to take into banknote the part of the crime and not be punished for crimes committed in the circumstances that exceeded conventional forces of human nature that is true(p) behavior should not require the thoughtfulness of heroism.